Charlottesville Profile: Key Outcomes

Published

July 2025

Introduction

Ensuring the full inclusion of residents in the social, economic, and civic life of a region supports the long-term health and vibrancy of a community. The systems of education, employment, housing, and health care affect all residents, but they do not always promote well-being for all residents. An inclusive community is one in which all individuals—regardless of their racial, ethnic, religious, gender, or sexual identity, their age or place of birth, their economic circumstances or neighborhood of residence—can access resources and opportunities that advance health, civic participation, and economic security.

Full Report PDF

This interactive online version of the Community Wellbeing Profile presents key outcomes from the full report. For further metrics, analysis, policy connections, and data sources, please see the report PDF: City of Charlottesville Community Wellbeing Profile

Demographics

A locality’s demographic composition can reflect the area’s past and current policy choices, inform the diverse needs of different community members, and provide insight into the region’s cultural inclusivity. The profile begins by examining the population attributes of the estimated 51,743 city residents.1

See the full report for additional measures on age, gender, language and linguistic isolation, and the prevalence of disabilities among residents in the City of Charlottesville.

American Human Development Index (AHDI)

The American Human Development Index (AHDI) is a metric that assesses well-being along three axes: health, access to knowledge, and living standards. This metric was created by Measure of America of the Social Science Research Council to be estimated at geographic levels, such as states and counties, and to speak directly to the American context of an affluent democracy.2

Each component of AHDI—health, access to knowledge, and living standards—is scored on a 0 to 10 scale for a specific geography.3 The AHDI is the average of these three scores: each component carries equal weight in the composite index as all carry equal importance for community well-being.

The following table shows AHDI for City of Charlottesville, Albemarle County, Virginia overall, and other localities that serve as comparative benchmarks.

American Human Development Index: Comparison Across Benchmark Localities
American HD Index
Health
Access to Knowledge
Living Standards
Life Expectancy (years) At Least High School Diploma At Least Bachelor’s Degree Graduate Degree School Enrollment Median Earnings (2023 $)
Local
Charlottesville 6.2 79 93% 61% 33% 87% $38,285
Albemarle 7.3 82 94% 61% 31% 85% $51,922
State & US
Virginia 5.8 78 91% 41% 18% 76% $49,405
United States 5.3 78 89% 35% 14% 76% $44,587
Benchmark Localities
Alexandria City 7.9 82 93% 66% 34% 75% $73,247
Lynchburg City 4.0 74 90% 39% 15% 79% $29,505
Richmond City 5.0 75 89% 44% 18% 77% $41,143
Roanoke City 3.8 71 90% 29% 11% 73% $37,740
Williamsburg City 3.5 77 93% 48% 22% 93% $14,331
Arlington 8.9 85 95% 77% 41% 74% $88,306
Data Sources: Life Expectancy: County Health Rankings, 2024. Education and Earnings: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates, 2023.

Within the city, there are large differences in AHDI across neighborhoods. That is, people are experiencing different outcomes in their health, education, and living standards depending on where they live.

The map below shows the AHDI for each census tract. Census tracts are areas determined by the U.S. Census Bureau to approximate neighborhoods; they are roughly equal in population and are bounded by major roads, rivers and railroad tracks.

American Human Development Index (AHDI) by Census Tract

Census Tract AHDI Value
Fry's Springs Locust Grove 7.8
Downtown Area Greenbrier-Meadows 7.7
Woolen Mills 6.7
Barracks-Rugby 6.3
Belmont 6.2
Rose Hill-Harris-Venable 5.5
Fifeville-Cherry Avenue 5.2
Ridge St. 5.1
JPA-Fontaine 4.1
10th & Page-Venable 2.0



To better understand the nature of these discrepancies, the following figure shows the value for each individual AHDI component by census tract.

Neighborhoods like Barracks-Rugby, JPA-Fontaine, and 10th & Page-Venable have a wide gap between their AHDI components, with high values in their education index and low values in earnings. Some of this can be explained by the off-campus student housing prevalent in these areas of the city, as students tend to make very low wages while enrolled full time at the University. However, the presence of low-earning students does not account for all of the apparent economic precarity.4

US Census data provides further detail on residents in these neighborhoods that helps us better understand the impact of student populations on poverty rates in the city. The following table shows several related measures for each tract surrounding the University: the overall poverty rate and the poverty rate for non-students, the percent of residents who received SNAP benefits within the past 12 months (in 2023), and the percent of residents considered “college-aged.”

Student and non-student residents in neighborhoods surrounding the University
Overall Poverty Rate Non-Student Poverty Rate Received SNAP benefits Residents 18-24 yrs.
10th & Page-Venable 61% 41% 22% 55%
JPA-Fontaine 65% 21% 7% 76%
Barracks-Rugby 20% 9% 2% 37%
Charlottesville Overall 23% 14% 10% 20%
Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates, 2023

The above table makes it clear that in the area of 10th & Page-Venable, a historically Black neighborhood that now contains numerous rental properties frequently occupied by UVA students, there is significant financial need that cannot be attributed to student residents. Comparing poverty rates between non-student residents (41%) and the tract overall (61%) suggests that the overall poverty rate for this tract is not heavily impacted by students but reflects the high rate of intergenerational poverty in the neighborhood. In addition, 22% of residents are estimated to be receiving SNAP benefits—a significantly higher rate than the city overall. While over half of residents are college-aged, there are also around 550 families, 365 of these with children, living in the 10th & Page-Venable neighborhood.5

College students do have an overall impact on the demographics and measures on poverty in Charlottesville. Over 20% of the population is between the ages of 18 and 24 years old, and the student population does appear to contribute to the rate of poverty in the city: the overall poverty rate is 23% while the rate for non-student residents is significantly less, at 14%. This pattern is especially apparent in the JPA-Fontaine and Barracks-Rugby areas.

College student poverty is frequently transitional; the structural poverty facing our community is persistent. Charlottesville’s status as a college town can obscure the reality of structural poverty in many Charlottesville neighborhoods, particularly those that are University-adjacent.

A Long and Healthy Life: Health Profile

The health care we receive and the individual choices we make impact our health, but so do the places where we live, work, play and pray—the social determinants of health. The CDC estimates that as much as 50% of individual health is due to “social, economic, and environmental factors, such as education, racism, discrimination, and housing.”6 That is, many disparities in health stem from inequities in the opportunities and resources needed to be healthy.

Health Insurance

Health insurance supports access to routine health care and provides some protection from unanticipated medical expenses. In Charlottesville, 1 in 15 people do not have health insurance. Those without insurance are less likely to have a primary care provider, are more likely to delay or forgo needed care, and receive fewer preventative services.7 There are major demographic and geographic disparities in health insurance coverage across the county.

Residents with No Health Insurance by Census Tract

Census Tract Uninsured
Woolen Mills 14%
Ridge St. 12%
Rose Hill-Harris-Venable 9%
Fifeville-Cherry Avenue 9%
10th & Page-Venable 6%
Fry's Springs 5%
JPA-Fontaine 4%
Barracks-Rugby 3%
Locust Grove 3%
Downtown Area 3%
Belmont 2%
Greenbrier-Meadows 1%



The full profile provides additional health measures including life expectancy, food security, various health outcome and prevention metrics, and EMS responses to opiod overdoses for the City of Charlottesville.

Access to Knowledge: Education Profile

Education promotes personal development in multiple ways and directly influences employment and earnings, which in turn influence access to decent housing, food, healthcare, transportation, and more. Education also enhances individual and collective civic life. Charlottesville is frequently celebrated for its educational environment, hosting a highly ranked university and ranking highly on lists of ‘best places to live’ which note the city’s well-educated population. More granular data on educational attainment in Charlottesville tells a more complex story and points to paths for improvement.

Degree Attainment

The figure below shows how degree attainment varies across residents by race and ethnicity in the City of Charlottesville.

There is also significant geographic variation in the rates of bachelor’s degree attainment throughout the city.

Education Level: Bachelor’s Degree or Higher by Census Tract

Census Tract BA or Higher
Downtown Area 78%
Barracks-Rugby 77%
Fry's Springs 75%
JPA-Fontaine 73%
Locust Grove 62%
Greenbrier-Meadows 61%
Rose Hill-Harris-Venable 58%
Belmont 57%
Woolen Mills 56%
10th & Page-Venable 50%
Ridge St. 43%
Fifeville-Cherry Avenue 36%



The full profile provides additional education measures including school enrollment in the City of Charlottesville and AP and Dual Enrollment, Suspensions, and Chronic Absenteeism in Charlottesville Public Schools.

Decent Standard of Living: Economic Security and Housing Profile

Living standards encompass access to the material needs of life—housing, security, goods and services. It is captured through measures on earnings, household income, homeownership and renting. Data on earnings and income contextualize the struggle some residents face to achieve economic stability and to afford basic necessities. Data on home ownership and housing burden point to the pressing challenges around housing affordability.

Earnings and Income

Median earnings represent the midpoint of all household incomes, meaning half of households earn more and half earn less than that amount. The median is generally considered a more representative measure of typical income compared to the average, as it’s not affected by extreme outliers (very high or low incomes). The median personal earnings of Charlottesville residents vary significantly by sex and by race.

Median Household Income

While median personal earnings quantify well-being at the individual level, economic power is often pooled within family units. And many tax and policy interventions are monitored at the household level. Below, the median household income is provided to more directly relate financial well-being to the cost of living in the area.

Median Household Income by Census Tract

Census Tract Med Household Income
Greenbrier-Meadows $114,000
Belmont $102,000
Downtown Area $100,000
Locust Grove $89,000
Fry's Springs $88,000
Barracks-Rugby $83,000
Woolen Mills $81,000
Ridge St. $63,000
Rose Hill-Harris-Venable $62,000
Fifeville-Cherry Avenue $60,000
JPA-Fontaine $31,000
10th & Page-Venable $20,000



As with personal earnings, data on median household income by race reveal troubling racial and ethnic disparities.

Struggling Families: Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)

Comprehensive measures of financial hardship must consider both income and the broader cost of living: United Way developed the asset limited, income constrained, employed (ALICE) threshold for this purpose. The ALICE threshold is calibrated to specific localities, and represents the lowest possible income that households need to earn to afford their basic needs. These essentials include the costs of housing, healthcare, food, transportation, technology, taxes, and childcare.

Many households with incomes below their local cost of living threshold, but above the federal poverty line may not be traditionally thought of as financially burdened. Because their incomes are above the federal poverty line, these households do not qualify for some federal assistance programs and their disadvantaged financial status is often overlooked by local governments. Inequities are amplified when local government interventions neglect the burdens of households who are working hard, and earning above the federal poverty threshold, but still not enough to meet their family’s basic needs.

The ALICE threshold, or the real cost of living, for the City of Charlottesville has increased over the past decade. In 2010, this threshold for survival was $45,000 for households under 65; this grew to $69,000 in 2023. The percentages of households with incomes above the poverty line and under the ALICE threshold in Charlottesville differs across race and ethnicity.

Housing: Renters and Owners

Housing costs are one of the primary drivers of the rising costs of living. Housing is a significant expense, and in our housing affordability crisis there can be limited options for those families who are not earning enough to meet the area’s rising costs.

Zillow’s observed rent index (ZORI) is a measure of a locality’s representative market-rate rent.

Many residents face economic hardship over rising rents, but these burdens are not equally shared.

Gross Rent by Census Tract

Census Tract Gross Rent
Rose Hill-Harris-Venable $1,800
Woolen Mills $1,800
Fry's Springs $1,600
Locust Grove $1,600
Downtown Area $1,600
10th & Page-Venable $1,500
Barracks-Rugby $1,500
JPA-Fontaine $1,300
Greenbrier-Meadows $1,300
Belmont $1,200
Ridge St. $1,100
Fifeville-Cherry Avenue $1,100



The impact of high rental costs on economic security is evident in estimates of how much of a household’s income goes towards housing. A household is rent burdened if 30% or more of their monthly income is spent on housing. If these costs are over 50% of household income, they are considered severely burdened by the cost of housing. The number of rent burdened households varies geographically across census tracts in Charlottesville.

Addressing disparities in home ownership rates is critical for ensuring equitable access to economic stability and wealth-building opportunities for all Charlottesville residents.

Home Ownership by Census Tract

Census Tract Percent Home Ownership
Greenbrier-Meadows 74%
Locust Grove 69%
Belmont 61%
Barracks-Rugby 51%
Fry's Springs 48%
Ridge St. 47%
Woolen Mills 45%
Fifeville-Cherry Avenue 42%
Downtown Area 36%
Rose Hill-Harris-Venable 27%
10th & Page-Venable 8%
JPA-Fontaine 8%



The full profile provides additional measures on living standards including ALICE thresholds for 2010-2023, and home ownership by race and ethnicity.

Additional Community Wellbeing Profiles

The partnership between the UVA Center for Community Partnerships, Albemarle County, and the City of Charlottesville also produced two additional profiles:

Footnotes

  1. University of Virginia Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service. (2024). Virginia Population Estimates. Retrieved from https://coopercenter.org/virginia-population-estimates.↩︎

  2. “About Human Development.” Measure of America, https://measureofamerica.org/human-development/↩︎

  3. See the Measure of America Methodological Notes for the complete methodology: https://measureofamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/The-Measure-of-America-2010-2011-Methodological-Notes.pdf↩︎

  4. Juday, Luke and Rorem, Annie. How to modify poverty calculations for college towns. 2016. Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service, University of Virginia. https://www.coopercenter.org/research/how-modify-poverty-calculations-college-towns↩︎

  5. U.S. Census Bureau. “Family Type by Presence and Age of Related Children Under 18 Years.” American Community Survey, ACS 5-Year Estimates Detailed Tables, Table B11004, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSDT5Y2023.B11004?q=B11004&g=1400000US51540000202.↩︎

  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Community Health Improvement Navigator,” Last modified August 19, 2015, https://www.cdc.gov/chinav/index.html↩︎

  7. Report: The Importance of Health Coverage. American Hospital Association. https://www.aha.org/guidesreports/report-importance-health-coverage↩︎